Pormonism (or, Porn meets Mormonism)
Posted by Joseph on April 28, 2008
Exponent II magazine recently dedicated an entire volume to the topic of porn addiction. The volume is available for free online, and has a number of different articles on the topic. A good blog discussion is also available at Exponent blog.
I’m glad that the magazine and blog are addressing the topic of porn. It’s an important issue for a lot of people, and it’s one that is often swept under the carpet. This kind of sustained discussion can be a good thing.
I’m less happy with the ultimate product, though. It seems to me that, while it has some real good material, it also has some significant omissions, blind spots, and problems.
My biggest complaint is the way the authors accept the orthodox LDS view that that porn is typically destructive. I don’t agree with that baseline assumption. A good deal of the underlying phenomenon that is normal and natural. It is normal to be turned on by nude bodies of attractive people. This is not really crazy or perverted.
This isn’t to say that there aren’t real problems with porn.
For one thing, popular pornographic images promote totally unrealistic and damaging ideals of the body, particularly the female body. All women are expected to have 44DD super-perky boobs and 28 inch waists (and all men are expected to have 12-inch cocks). This phenomenon, especially combined with other messages in society, and tells people (particularly women) “you’re too fat,” “your boobs aren’t big enough,” and so on. And it leads to problems like anorexia, depression, and the like.
For another thing, there is a significant chunk of the porn market that is really disturbing. Child porn; rape-fantasy porn; violent porn; really disturbing stuff. No way any of that is in the least bit acceptable.
And for a third, many porn actresses who leave the industry give accounts of abuse, drug or alcohol problems, psychological problems, and being trapped in the industry. You can read all sorts of awful, true stories. I’m absolutely against porn that relies on abusing women.
And finally, porn addiction does exist. It’s real, and can be really harmful in people’s lives. I know of one person, for instance, who could not hold a job because of his addiction. He was fired on his first day of work at one job, because he was found masturbating in the break room. I feel sorry for people who are truly porn addicts — they need professional help, and I wish them luck in their recovery.
That said –
Mormons tend to blow porn WAY out of proportion. A member who looks at a Playboy once at age sixteen is branded as a porn addict forever. Any glance at an image is treated like leprosy. Men are made to feel extreme guilty about their natural physical responses to sexual images.
This guilt leads to all sorts of problems. It also creates unrealistic expectations among members. The Mormon porn-guilt complex almost certainly causes way more damage than any actual porn addiction among church members, and it trivializes the real problems of addiction.
For instance, Mormon women are culturally encouraged to view any porn use as awful, destructive, a betrayal. It’s like an affair. I’ve heard Mormon women say just that – porn use is “cheating on me with the computer.” This trivializes the real problems of cheating, to say the least.
This is a volatile combination. Mormon men WILL end up seeing something, somewhere, given the realities of TV, the Internet, etc. They are very likely to be shocked, and probably likely to look at images and be aroused. Meanwhile, Mormon women are ingrained to see that as an awful betrayal. And Mormon men are likely to be guilty, evasive, self-condemning, about it all.
The current dominant LDS approach of guilt (male) and overreaction (female) is also harmful because it fosters a reaction of deception, dishonesty, and closed communication. This is probably far more harmful to relationships than porn itself.
Relationships thrive on honesty, openness, communication. It would be a thousand times better to stop harping on the awful evils of porn (and thus encourage deception), and instead focus on building good relationships with our spouse or partner.
The bottom line is, the extreme emphasis on porn in Mormon culture creates unrealistic expectations about porn, women, men, images.
And that’s my big complaint with the Exponent issue. It does a good job at expressing women’s voices, which is admirable. But it doesn’t address the elephant in the room — the unrealistic expectations about porn, men, women, and relationships, which are created by structural problems in Mormon doctrine and culture.
JohnW said
I had a similar reaction. There seemed to be a blurring of the line between “likes looking at porn,” and “is addicted to porn,” despite one of the article clearly drawing a line between the two.
Is masturbating to a non-visual fantasy “cheating with his brain?”
chanson said
Personally, I’m not convinced that the addiction model is that useful for describing behaviors that have their root in innate biological drives such as eating and sex. And the fact that any desire to look at porn is systematically labeled “addiction” by the church community comes off as trying to find a secular second opinion to justify why it’s bad, as though deep down they don’t think that calling masturbation-with-porn a sin is sufficient to condemn it…
JohnR said
I started writing a defense of the addiction terminology (not the way the Church uses, but in clinical usage), and the more I wrote, the more problematic it seems. My concern is that there needs to be a way to distinguish, label and approach socially harmful behaviors (for example, difficult to suppress urges to fondle others or to expose oneself to non-consenting persons) from healthy ones. Religion has a tendency to label otherwise healthy behavior as socially aberrant (male masturbation is perhaps the best example).
Maybe this is one reason Mormonism has spirits, angels and an all-seeing god: even if you jerk off behind the bathroom door, you’re still doing it in public.
Unrealistic Expectations? « The Visitors’ Center said
[...] of MasturbationDoctor Jane on Fast Offerings: A Personal History of MasturbationJohnR on Pormonism (or, Porn meets Mormonism)chanson on Pormonism (or, Porn meets Mormonism)chanson on A sticky situationJohnW on [...]
MoJo said
Slightly tangential: Art.
Being LDS and liking art. Do you look at representations of the naked human body. Is that pornography? Are you an addict? Does it matter how old the art is?
Being LDS and being an artist. Do you represent naked human bodies in your art and if so, are you making pornography?
I think the inability to draw a line between art/pornography is what feeds the deluge of mediocre interchangeable religious art that takes the bloggernacle by the throat. I know a devout LDS artist who sculpts nudes and I asked him about this dichotomy. He shrugged at me helplessly and said, “I don’t know.”
xJane said
Re: addiction
People familiar with me can predict this argument & will probably roll their eyes for me bringing it up, but, Aristotle’s model of the “middle way” between two extremes may be useful to us here. Use of porn (use of food) can be excessive to the point that it causes harm to the user or the relationships the user has. It can also be deficient to the same point. Perhaps the best example of “deficient porn use” is the woman who thinks glancing at Maxim is equal to cheating on her. Although that said, I think Jesus’ “if you think about it, it’s just as bad” rule is pretty unrealistic.
Re: porn
I’m trying to come to terms with my own feelings about whether or not porn can be sustainable. Porn that celebrates sexuality without demeaning it (even if demeaning is your name of the game), porn that does not emotionally/physically damage is actors, and porn that does not depend upon a male-heterosexual consumer would be awesome! I’ve never met any such porn. But I will defend the right of porn to exist (and the rights of its users to use) because of the possibility of such a model. In general, I see most porn as being WalMart: people generally agree it’s despicable, but it’s cheap/ubiquitous. Does anyone know where I can get some Whole Foods or REI porn?
chanson said
I agree about the middle way and moderation in all things. I’m just saying that not all extreme behaviors are the same. Overeating or fixation on sex can’t necessarily be dealt with effectively by assuming they work just like a chemical dependency.
Re: “porn that does not depend upon a male-heterosexual consumer”
So you’re saying it’s okay for some gender/orientation combos to have erotic materials that turn them on. Just not straight men.